3931 vs BE: CALB Co. Ltd. vs Bloom Energy Corp
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
39
3931•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$37.24
-1.53%
BE•United States
$207.86
-1.05%
Quick Summary
CALB Co. Ltd. is 1.7× the market cap of Bloom Energy Corp. BE trades at a lower P/E than 3931.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 3931 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$37.24 | $207.86 |
| Daily Change | -1.53% | -1.05% |
| 1-Year Return | 140.88% | 1122.71% |
| 52-Week High | HK$37.82 | $219.03 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$15.60 | $16.32 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$28.96 | $151.60 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$27.10 | $90.43 |
| Beta | 0.18 | 3.18 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 3931 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $65.04B | $37.38B |
| Enterprise Value | $116.81B | $38.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44.40B | $1.33B |
| Shares Outstanding | 761.50M | 280.55M |
| Float | 523.61M | 264.24M |
| Employees | 10,534 | 2,214 |
Valuation
| Metric | 3931 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 38.23 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 28.82 | 106.38 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.00 | 4.27 |
| Price / Sales | 1.46 | 18.47 |
| Price / Book | 1.58 | 54.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.58 | 2127.37 |
Profitability
| Metric | 3931 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 3.32% | -4.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 3.28% | 13.27% |
| Return on Equity | 4.13% | -12.65% |
| Return on Assets | 1.18% | 1.57% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.38 | -0.37 |
Growth
| Metric | 3931 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 82.00% | 35.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 92.50% | -98.80% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 3931 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.41 | 7.66 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 7.94 | 8.55 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 6.08 | 10.96 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5507 | 0.5360 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 9/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #24,312 | #27,957 |
Ownership
| Metric | 3931 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4830.90% | 615.30% |
| % Institutions | 726.10% | 8694.80% |
Compare 3931 to peers
Compare BE to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.