3816 vs CMHHY: MISC vs China Merchants Port Holdings Co Ltd ADR
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
38
3816•KLSE
MYR 8.17
+0.49%
CM
CMHHY•United States
$20.40
-5.12%
Quick Summary
MISC is 3.7× the market cap of China Merchants Port Holdings Co Ltd ADR. CMHHY pays a dividend; 3816 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | MYR 8.17 | $20.40 |
| Daily Change | 0.49% | -5.12% |
| 1-Year Return | 19.12% | 34.78% |
| 52-Week High | MYR 8.59 | $21.81 |
| 52-Week Low | MYR 6.74 | $16.27 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $20.10 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $19.47 |
| Beta | — | 0.62 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.71B | $9.60B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $11.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $12.50B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 419.80M |
| Float | — | 1.17B |
| Employees | — | 8,792 |
Valuation
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 10.09 |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.86 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.77 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.65 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 8.05 |
Profitability
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 56.87% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 40.56% |
| Return on Equity | — | 6.76% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.63% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 2.14 |
Growth
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 67.40% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -26.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.10% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.89 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.15 | 1.09 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.60 | 0.38 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.93 | 0.69 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5279 | 0.5983 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,210 |
Ownership
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 0.00% |
Compare 3816 to peers
Compare CMHHY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.