3816 vs CMHHF: MISC vs China Merchants Port Holdings Company Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
38
3816•KLSE
MYR 8.17
+0.49%
CM
CMHHF•United States
$1.97
+0.00%
Quick Summary
MISC is 4.3× the market cap of China Merchants Port Holdings Company Limited. CMHHF pays a dividend; 3816 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | MYR 8.17 | $1.97 |
| Daily Change | 0.49% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 19.12% | 23.12% |
| 52-Week High | MYR 8.59 | $2.28 |
| 52-Week Low | MYR 6.74 | $1.31 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $1.99 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $1.94 |
| Beta | — | 0.62 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.71B | $8.40B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $11.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $12.50B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 4.20B |
| Float | — | 1.17B |
| Employees | — | 8,792 |
Valuation
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 9.52 |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.75 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.67 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.60 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 8.05 |
Profitability
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 56.87% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 40.56% |
| Return on Equity | — | 6.76% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.63% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.21 |
Growth
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 67.40% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -26.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 44.30% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.89 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.15 | 0.03 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.60 | 0.01 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.93 | -0.11 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5279 | 0.4863 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,210 |
Ownership
| Metric | 3816 | CMHHF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7208.30% |
| % Institutions | — | 942.20% |
Compare 3816 to peers
Compare CMHHF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.