3816 vs 601919: MISC vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
38
3816•KLSE
MYR 8.17
+0.49%
601919•SHG
CN¥14.72
-1.34%
Quick Summary
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd is 6.3× the market cap of MISC. 601919 pays a dividend; 3816 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 3816 | 601919 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | MYR 8.17 | CN¥14.72 |
| Daily Change | 0.49% | -1.34% |
| 1-Year Return | 19.12% | 3.52% |
| 52-Week High | MYR 8.59 | CN¥16.97 |
| 52-Week Low | MYR 6.74 | CN¥14.15 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥15.17 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥15.09 |
| Beta | — | 0.74 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 3816 | 601919 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.71B | $225.40B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $148.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $219.50B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 12.56B |
| Float | — | 7.15B |
| Employees | — | 32,768 |
Valuation
| Metric | 3816 | 601919 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 7.43 |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.52 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.26 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.03 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 3.30 |
Profitability
| Metric | 3816 | 601919 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 14.06% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 7.82% |
| Return on Equity | — | 12.39% |
| Return on Assets | — | 4.32% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.98 |
Growth
| Metric | 3816 | 601919 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -12.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -64.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 3816 | 601919 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 6.70% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 1.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 3816 | 601919 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.15 | -0.69 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.60 | -0.76 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.93 | -2.67 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5279 | 0.6273 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #8,776 |
Ownership
| Metric | 3816 | 601919 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 6106.30% |
| % Institutions | — | 829.40% |
Compare 3816 to peers
Compare 601919 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.