3816 vs 600428: MISC vs COSCO SHIPPING Specialized Carriers Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
38
3816•KLSE
MYR 8.17
+0.49%
CN¥9.04
-0.77%
Quick Summary
MISC is 1.4× the market cap of COSCO SHIPPING Specialized Carriers Co Ltd. 600428 pays a dividend; 3816 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 3816 | 600428 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | MYR 8.17 | CN¥9.04 |
| Daily Change | 0.49% | -0.77% |
| 1-Year Return | 19.12% | 54.79% |
| 52-Week High | MYR 8.59 | CN¥9.60 |
| 52-Week Low | MYR 6.74 | CN¥5.87 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥8.42 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥7.36 |
| Beta | — | 0.61 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 3816 | 600428 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.71B | $24.81B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $36.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $23.21B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 2.74B |
| Float | — | 1.62B |
| Employees | — | 5,548 |
Valuation
| Metric | 3816 | 600428 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 13.10 |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.11 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 14.83 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.07 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.48 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 5.44 |
Profitability
| Metric | 3816 | 600428 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 7.67% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 14.20% |
| Return on Equity | — | 14.66% |
| Return on Assets | — | 5.55% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.69 |
Growth
| Metric | 3816 | 600428 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 39.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 7.50% |
Dividends
| Metric | 3816 | 600428 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 3.57% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.33 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 3816 | 600428 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.19 | 4.37 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.63 | 2.53 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.09 | 8.11 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5279 | 0.5068 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #9,790 |
Ownership
| Metric | 3816 | 600428 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 6077.40% |
| % Institutions | — | 236.20% |
Compare 3816 to peers
Compare 600428 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.