3816 vs 600018: MISC vs Shanghai International Port Group Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
38
3816•KLSE
MYR 8.17
+0.49%
600018•SHG
CN¥4.93
-1.00%
Quick Summary
Shanghai International Port Group Co Ltd is 3.2× the market cap of MISC. 600018 pays a dividend; 3816 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 3816 | 600018 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | MYR 8.17 | CN¥4.93 |
| Daily Change | 0.49% | -1.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 19.12% | -10.69% |
| 52-Week High | MYR 8.59 | CN¥5.90 |
| 52-Week Low | MYR 6.74 | CN¥4.93 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥5.07 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥5.43 |
| Beta | — | 0.12 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 3816 | 600018 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.71B | $115.00B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $132.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $39.61B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 23.28B |
| Float | — | 2.82B |
| Employees | — | 13,016 |
Valuation
| Metric | 3816 | 600018 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 8.52 |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.34 |
| Price / Sales | — | 2.90 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 5.53 |
Profitability
| Metric | 3816 | 600018 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 34.24% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 14.77% |
| Return on Equity | — | 9.86% |
| Return on Assets | — | 2.99% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.58 |
Growth
| Metric | 3816 | 600018 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 6.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -27.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | 3816 | 600018 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 3.92% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.20 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 3816 | 600018 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.15 | -1.90 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.60 | -1.56 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.93 | -4.50 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5279 | 0.5729 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #14,684 |
Ownership
| Metric | 3816 | 600018 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 8776.40% |
| % Institutions | — | 463.80% |
Compare 3816 to peers
Compare 600018 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.