3808 vs 6326: Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd vs KUBOTA CORPORATION
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
3808•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$41.26
-3.73%
6326•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥2,571.00
-1.40%
Quick Summary
KUBOTA CORPORATION is 22.4× the market cap of Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd. 3808 pays a dividend; 6326 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 3808 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$41.26 | ¥2,571.00 |
| Daily Change | -3.73% | -1.40% |
| 1-Year Return | 125.71% | 58.54% |
| 52-Week High | HK$47.44 | ¥3,242.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$17.88 | ¥1,523.82 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$40.29 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$29.55 | — |
| Beta | 1.38 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 3808 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $119.27B | $2.67T |
| Enterprise Value | $105.86B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $109.54B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.76B | — |
| Float | 719.63M | — |
| Employees | 28,614 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 3808 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 14.79 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.29 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.75 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.14 | — |
| Price / Book | 2.54 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.40 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 3808 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 6.41% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 6.89% | — |
| Return on Equity | 14.98% | — |
| Return on Assets | 3.60% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 2.18 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 3808 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 26.90% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 39.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 3808 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.23% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.46 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 3808 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 6.27 | 2.03 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.32 | 1.14 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 10.33 | 2.83 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6771 | 0.5535 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #10,673 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 3808 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7393.60% | — |
| % Institutions | 745.10% | — |
Compare 3808 to peers
Compare 6326 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.