373220 vs BE: LG Energy Solution Ltd vs Bloom Energy Corp
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
37
373220•KO
₩418,000.00
+0.48%
BE•United States
$207.86
-1.05%
Quick Summary
LG Energy Solution Ltd is 2599.5× the market cap of Bloom Energy Corp. BE trades at a lower P/E than 373220.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 373220 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ₩418,000.00 | $207.86 |
| Daily Change | 0.48% | -1.05% |
| 1-Year Return | 23.67% | 1122.71% |
| 52-Week High | ₩514,000.00 | $219.03 |
| 52-Week Low | ₩268,000.00 | $16.32 |
| 50-Day MA | ₩393,270.00 | $151.60 |
| 200-Day MA | ₩392,677.50 | $90.43 |
| Beta | 0.99 | 3.18 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 373220 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $97.17T | $37.38B |
| Enterprise Value | $111.00T | $38.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.67T | $1.33B |
| Shares Outstanding | 234.00M | 280.55M |
| Float | 47.16M | 264.24M |
| Employees | 12,433 | 2,214 |
Valuation
| Metric | 373220 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 131.58 | 106.38 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.36 | 4.27 |
| Price / Sales | 4.10 | 18.47 |
| Price / Book | 4.56 | 54.79 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.67 | 2127.37 |
Profitability
| Metric | 373220 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -4.53% | -4.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.41% | 13.27% |
| Return on Equity | 0.27% | -12.65% |
| Return on Assets | 1.32% | 1.57% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.00 | -0.37 |
Growth
| Metric | 373220 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -17.10% | 35.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 85.60% | -98.80% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 373220 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.12 | 7.66 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.69 | 8.55 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 8.16 | 10.96 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6529 | 0.5360 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #25,723 | #27,957 |
Ownership
| Metric | 373220 | BE |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7984.90% | 615.30% |
| % Institutions | 1173.60% | 8694.80% |
Compare 373220 to peers
Compare BE to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.