373220 vs 3931: LG Energy Solution Ltd vs CALB Co. Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
37
373220•KO
₩418,000.00
+0.48%
39
3931•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$37.24
-1.53%
Quick Summary
LG Energy Solution Ltd is 1493.9× the market cap of CALB Co. Ltd.. 373220 trades at a lower P/E than 3931.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 373220 | 3931 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ₩418,000.00 | HK$37.24 |
| Daily Change | 0.48% | -1.53% |
| 1-Year Return | 23.67% | 140.88% |
| 52-Week High | ₩514,000.00 | HK$37.82 |
| 52-Week Low | ₩268,000.00 | HK$15.60 |
| 50-Day MA | ₩393,270.00 | HK$28.96 |
| 200-Day MA | ₩392,677.50 | HK$27.10 |
| Beta | 0.99 | 0.18 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 373220 | 3931 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $97.17T | $65.04B |
| Enterprise Value | $111.00T | $116.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.67T | $44.40B |
| Shares Outstanding | 234.00M | 761.50M |
| Float | 47.16M | 523.61M |
| Employees | 12,433 | 10,534 |
Valuation
| Metric | 373220 | 3931 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 38.23 |
| Forward P/E | 131.58 | 28.82 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.36 | 1.00 |
| Price / Sales | 4.10 | 1.46 |
| Price / Book | 4.56 | 1.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.67 | 32.58 |
Profitability
| Metric | 373220 | 3931 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -4.53% | 3.32% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.41% | 3.28% |
| Return on Equity | 0.27% | 4.13% |
| Return on Assets | 1.32% | 1.18% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.38 |
Growth
| Metric | 373220 | 3931 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -17.10% | 82.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 85.60% | 92.50% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 373220 | 3931 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.12 | 3.41 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.69 | 7.94 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 8.16 | 6.08 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6529 | 0.5507 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | 9/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #25,723 | #24,312 |
Ownership
| Metric | 373220 | 3931 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7984.90% | 4830.90% |
| % Institutions | 1173.60% | 726.10% |
Compare 373220 to peers
Compare 3931 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.