3231 vs CLNXF: Nomura Real Estate Holdings,Inc. vs Cellnex Telecom S.A
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
3231•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,022.00
-1.83%
CL
CLNXF•United States
$34.01
-1.38%
Quick Summary
Nomura Real Estate Holdings,Inc. is 39.6× the market cap of Cellnex Telecom S.A.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 3231 | CLNXF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥1,022.00 | $34.01 |
| Daily Change | -1.83% | -1.38% |
| 1-Year Return | 16.52% | -8.08% |
| 52-Week High | ¥1,162.50 | $40.61 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥811.80 | $28.67 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $33.31 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $34.26 |
| Beta | — | 1.31 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 3231 | CLNXF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $881.04B | $22.24B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $46.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $4.12B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 673.55M |
| Float | — | 557.06M |
| Employees | — | 2,494 |
Valuation
| Metric | 3231 | CLNXF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | — | 1428.57 |
| Price / Sales | — | 5.40 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 13.45 |
Profitability
| Metric | 3231 | CLNXF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | -8.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 7.01% |
| Return on Equity | — | -2.46% |
| Return on Assets | — | 0.79% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | -0.61 |
Growth
| Metric | 3231 | CLNXF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 36.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -85.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 3231 | CLNXF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 3231 | CLNXF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.49 | 3.63 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.30 | 1.23 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.39 | 11.02 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5770 | 0.7833 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #26,463 |
Ownership
| Metric | 3231 | CLNXF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.20% |
| % Institutions | — | 6785.60% |
Compare 3231 to peers
Compare CLNXF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.