Home 301268 vs VIO 301268 vs VIO: Shenzhen Minglida Precision Technology Co. Ltd. vs Viohalco S.A Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Shenzhen Minglida Precision Technology Co. Ltd. is 2.5× the market cap of Viohalco S.A. 301268 trades at a lower P/E than VIO. VIO pays a dividend; 301268 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 301268 VIO Current Price CN¥22.73 €14.80 Daily Change 0.44% 3.93% 1-Year Return 42.69% 180.30% 52-Week High CN¥25.12 €15.96 52-Week Low CN¥15.89 €5.36 50-Day MA CN¥22.73 €13.49 200-Day MA CN¥21.24 €9.94 Beta 0.12 1.00
Size & Revenue Metric 301268 VIO Market Cap $9.13B $3.67B Enterprise Value $11.02B $5.75B Revenue (TTM) $3.04B $7.23B Shares Outstanding 400.40M 259.19M Float 130.85M 41.61M Employees 3,825 11,454
Valuation Metric 301268 VIO Trailing P/E 0.00 15.56 Forward P/E 0.00 0.00 PEG Ratio — 0.00 Price / Sales 3.00 0.51 Price / Book 5.03 1.75 EV / EBITDA 22.23 7.33
Profitability Metric 301268 VIO Profit Margin -13.50% 3.26% Operating Margin (TTM) -2.57% 8.84% Return on Equity -19.74% 12.42% Return on Assets -3.56% 4.88% Diluted EPS (TTM) -1.02 0.91
Growth Metric 301268 VIO Revenue Growth (YoY) 7.80% 11.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) -99.00% 57.20%
Dividends Metric 301268 VIO Dividend Yield — 1.89% Dividend / Share — 0.27
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 301268 VIO Sortino (Composite) 1.72 6.32 Sharpe (Composite) 0.89 7.65 Calmar (Composite) 1.39 12.00 Hurst Exponent 0.5242 0.5478 Piotroski F-Score 1/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank — #8,690
Ownership Metric 301268 VIO % Insiders 7443.80% 8395.00% % Institutions 459.60% 282.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.