Home 301268 vs AIAGY 301268 vs AIAGY: Shenzhen Minglida Precision Technology Co. Ltd. vs Aurubis AG ADR Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Shenzhen Minglida Precision Technology Co. Ltd. is 1.1× the market cap of Aurubis AG ADR. 301268 trades at a lower P/E than AIAGY. AIAGY pays a dividend; 301268 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 301268 AIAGY Current Price CN¥22.73 $104.46 Daily Change 0.44% 0.00% 1-Year Return 42.69% 126.59% 52-Week High CN¥25.12 $104.46 52-Week Low CN¥15.89 $42.98 50-Day MA CN¥22.73 $91.55 200-Day MA CN¥21.24 $65.93 Beta 0.12 1.23
Size & Revenue Metric 301268 AIAGY Market Cap $9.13B $8.11B Enterprise Value $11.02B $8.03B Revenue (TTM) $3.04B $19.30B Shares Outstanding 400.40M 87.32M Float 130.85M 30.23M Employees 3,825 7,228
Valuation Metric 301268 AIAGY Trailing P/E 0.00 11.64 Forward P/E 0.00 8.81 Price / Sales 3.00 0.42 Price / Book 5.03 1.32 EV / EBITDA 22.23 6.46
Profitability Metric 301268 AIAGY Profit Margin -13.50% 3.14% Operating Margin (TTM) -2.57% 8.03% Return on Equity -19.74% 11.90% Return on Assets -3.56% 5.28% Diluted EPS (TTM) -1.02 7.98
Growth Metric 301268 AIAGY Revenue Growth (YoY) 7.80% 25.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) -99.00% 25.40%
Dividends Metric 301268 AIAGY Dividend Yield — 1.72% Dividend / Share — 1.60
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 301268 AIAGY Sortino (Composite) 2.15 5.34 Sharpe (Composite) 1.17 2.29 Calmar (Composite) 2.64 6.03 Hurst Exponent 0.5242 0.5938 Piotroski F-Score 1/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank — #13,696
Ownership Metric 301268 AIAGY % Insiders 7443.80% 0.00% % Institutions 459.60% 0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.