Home 301268 vs AIAGF 301268 vs AIAGF: Shenzhen Minglida Precision Technology Co. Ltd. vs Aurubis AG Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Shenzhen Minglida Precision Technology Co. Ltd. and Aurubis AG are similar in size. 301268 trades at a lower P/E than AIAGF. AIAGF pays a dividend; 301268 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 301268 AIAGF Current Price CN¥22.73 $200.00 Daily Change 0.44% 0.00% 1-Year Return 42.69% 158.23% 52-Week High CN¥25.12 $200.00 52-Week Low CN¥15.89 $77.45 50-Day MA CN¥22.73 $163.16 200-Day MA CN¥21.24 $119.17 Beta 0.12 1.23
Size & Revenue Metric 301268 AIAGF Market Cap $9.13B $9.24B Enterprise Value $11.02B $8.03B Revenue (TTM) $3.04B $19.30B Shares Outstanding 400.40M 43.66M Float 130.85M 30.23M Employees 3,825 7,228
Valuation Metric 301268 AIAGF Trailing P/E 0.00 12.53 Forward P/E 0.00 8.96 PEG Ratio — 0.00 Price / Sales 3.00 0.48 Price / Book 5.03 1.42 EV / EBITDA 22.23 6.46
Profitability Metric 301268 AIAGF Profit Margin -13.50% 3.14% Operating Margin (TTM) -2.57% 8.03% Return on Equity -19.74% 11.90% Return on Assets -3.56% 5.28% Diluted EPS (TTM) -1.02 15.96
Growth Metric 301268 AIAGF Revenue Growth (YoY) 7.80% 25.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) -99.00% 25.40%
Dividends Metric 301268 AIAGF Dividend Yield — 0.80% Dividend / Share — 1.60
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 301268 AIAGF Sortino (Composite) 2.15 40.53 Sharpe (Composite) 1.17 2.74 Calmar (Composite) 2.64 31.61 Hurst Exponent 0.5242 0.5687 Piotroski F-Score 1/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank — #10,953
Ownership Metric 301268 AIAGF % Insiders 7443.80% 3853.20% % Institutions 459.60% 4422.60%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.