Home 300724 vs SHLAF 300724 vs SHLAF: Shenzhen SC New Energy Technology Corp Class A vs Schindler Holding AG Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Shenzhen SC New Energy Technology Corp Class A and Schindler Holding AG are similar in size. 300724 trades at a lower P/E than SHLAF. SHLAF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 300724 SHLAF Current Price CN¥110.23 $335.00 Daily Change -0.14% 0.00% 1-Year Return 105.65% 10.54% 52-Week High CN¥147.70 $410.62 52-Week Low CN¥50.89 $303.05 50-Day MA CN¥118.84 $374.82 200-Day MA CN¥98.42 $367.38 Beta 0.69 0.80
Size & Revenue Metric 300724 SHLAF Market Cap $38.17B $40.40B Enterprise Value $30.24B $29.85B Revenue (TTM) $19.65B $10.95B Shares Outstanding 348.29M 39.91M Float 253.18M 60.05M Employees 4,017 67,381
Valuation Metric 300724 SHLAF Trailing P/E 11.11 30.93 Forward P/E 31.45 24.88 PEG Ratio 0.57 3.48 Price / Sales 1.94 3.69 Price / Book 2.88 5.54 EV / EBITDA 7.57 13.61
Profitability Metric 300724 SHLAF Profit Margin 17.45% 9.27% Operating Margin (TTM) 21.62% 11.14% Return on Equity 28.92% 21.05% Return on Assets 6.13% 7.25% Diluted EPS (TTM) 9.86 11.96
Growth Metric 300724 SHLAF Revenue Growth (YoY) -17.30% -2.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) 7.80% 34.40%
Dividends Metric 300724 SHLAF Dividend Yield 1.09% 1.53% Dividend / Share 1.20 6.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300724 SHLAF Sortino (Composite) 1.20 0.05 Sharpe (Composite) 0.57 0.02 Calmar (Composite) 2.34 0.04 Hurst Exponent 0.6427 0.5426 Piotroski F-Score 9/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #4,518 #10,162
Ownership Metric 300724 SHLAF % Insiders 2651.20% 0.00% % Institutions 935.50% 4641.60%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.