Home 300593 vs SFFYF 300593 vs SFFYF: Beijing Xinleineng Technology Co Ltd vs Signify N.V Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Beijing Xinleineng Technology Co Ltd is 5.5× the market cap of Signify N.V. 300593 trades at a lower P/E than SFFYF. SFFYF pays a dividend; 300593 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 300593 SFFYF Current Price CN¥29.41 $20.50 Daily Change 5.56% 0.00% 1-Year Return 122.63% -0.70% 52-Week High CN¥36.08 $26.65 52-Week Low CN¥11.95 $20.50 50-Day MA CN¥27.47 — 200-Day MA CN¥23.91 — Beta 0.44 0.91
Size & Revenue Metric 300593 SFFYF Market Cap $16.03B $2.90B Enterprise Value $15.89B $3.50B Revenue (TTM) $1.17B $5.77B Shares Outstanding 542.50M 119.02M Float 399.52M 115.16M Employees 2,796 —
Valuation Metric 300593 SFFYF Trailing P/E 0.00 10.38 Forward P/E 0.00 — Price / Sales 13.72 0.50 Price / Book 6.33 0.94 EV / EBITDA 29.01 6.25
Profitability Metric 300593 SFFYF Profit Margin -38.77% 4.41% Operating Margin (TTM) 5.87% 7.64% Return on Equity -16.45% 8.62% Return on Assets -5.53% 3.79% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.85 2.35
Growth Metric 300593 SFFYF Revenue Growth (YoY) 94.90% -9.80% Earnings Growth (YoY) -30.20% -49.10%
Dividends Metric 300593 SFFYF Dividend Yield — 916.00% Dividend / Share — 1.88
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300593 SFFYF Sortino (Composite) 6.91 -1.73 Sharpe (Composite) 2.94 -1.64 Calmar (Composite) 2.28 -1.77 Hurst Exponent 0.6583 0.5883 Piotroski F-Score 1/9 —
Ownership Metric 300593 SFFYF % Insiders 3120.20% 6.64% % Institutions 1513.10% 85.55%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.