Sign up for free insights newsletter

300551 vs MSBPF: Shanghai GuAo Electronic Technology Co Ltd vs Mitsubishi Pencil Co. Ltd.

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥14.00
-1.06%
China
$4.49B
MS
MSBPFUnited States
N/A
United States
$948.53M

Quick Summary

Shanghai GuAo Electronic Technology Co Ltd is 4.7× the market cap of Mitsubishi Pencil Co. Ltd.. 300551 trades at a lower P/E than MSBPF. MSBPF pays a dividend; 300551 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric300551MSBPF
Current PriceCN¥14.00
Daily Change-1.06%
1-Year Return71.78%
52-Week HighCN¥20.75
52-Week LowCN¥7.84
50-Day MACN¥17.54
200-Day MACN¥14.35
Beta1.430.07

Size & Revenue

Metric300551MSBPF
Market Cap$4.49B$948.53M
Enterprise Value$4.62B$-19.33B
Revenue (TTM)$190.16M$89.81B
Shares Outstanding340.06M55.21M
Float276.07M50.74M
Employees433

Valuation

Metric300551MSBPF
Trailing P/E0.0013.32
Forward P/E0.00
Price / Sales23.610.01
Price / Book10.851.06
EV / EBITDA-86.94-1.28

Profitability

Metric300551MSBPF
Profit Margin-171.32%6.94%
Operating Margin (TTM)-32.42%13.06%
Return on Equity-55.43%4.78%
Return on Assets-7.63%3.37%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.961.29

Growth

Metric300551MSBPF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-47.90%-0.70%
Earnings Growth (YoY)53.20%-37.60%

Dividends

Metric300551MSBPF
Dividend Yield194.00%
Dividend / Share0.33

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric300551MSBPF
Sortino (Composite)0.37
Sharpe (Composite)0.11
Calmar (Composite)-0.54
Hurst Exponent0.5673
Piotroski F-Score5/9

Ownership

Metric300551MSBPF
% Insiders2739.20%13.82%
% Institutions214.00%31.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.