Sign up for free insights newsletter

300551 vs KUKYF: Shanghai GuAo Electronic Technology Co Ltd vs Kokuyo Co., Ltd.

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥14.00
-1.06%
China
$4.49B
KU
KUKYFUnited States
$5.59
+0.00%
United States
$2.41B

Quick Summary

Shanghai GuAo Electronic Technology Co Ltd is 1.9× the market cap of Kokuyo Co., Ltd.. 300551 trades at a lower P/E than KUKYF. KUKYF pays a dividend; 300551 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric300551KUKYF
Current PriceCN¥14.00$5.59
Daily Change-1.06%0.00%
1-Year Return71.78%-100.00%
52-Week HighCN¥20.75$1,000,000.00
52-Week LowCN¥7.84$4.25
50-Day MACN¥17.54
200-Day MACN¥14.35
Beta1.43-0.03

Size & Revenue

Metric300551KUKYF
Market Cap$4.49B$2.41B
Enterprise Value$4.62B$-101.09B
Revenue (TTM)$190.16M$359.88B
Shares Outstanding340.06M430.24M
Float276.07M363.16M
Employees433

Valuation

Metric300551KUKYF
Trailing P/E0.0019.96
Forward P/E0.00
Price / Sales23.610.01
Price / Book10.851.52
EV / EBITDA-86.94-2.89

Profitability

Metric300551KUKYF
Profit Margin-171.32%5.97%
Operating Margin (TTM)-32.42%5.16%
Return on Equity-55.43%8.36%
Return on Assets-7.63%4.58%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.960.28

Growth

Metric300551KUKYF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-47.90%8.70%
Earnings Growth (YoY)53.20%-12.20%

Dividends

Metric300551KUKYF
Dividend Yield269.00%
Dividend / Share0.15

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric300551KUKYF
Sortino (Composite)0.370.28
Sharpe (Composite)0.110.65
Calmar (Composite)-0.540.36
Hurst Exponent0.56730.5314
Piotroski F-Score5/9

Ownership

Metric300551KUKYF
% Insiders2739.20%24.15%
% Institutions214.00%25.43%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.