300469 vs AMTM: Trust Alliance Information Development Inc Ltd Shanghai vs Amentum Holdings Inc.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
CN¥56.12
+2.67%
AM
AMTM•United States
$27.58
+0.29%
Quick Summary
Trust Alliance Information Development Inc Ltd Shanghai is 2.0× the market cap of Amentum Holdings Inc.. 300469 trades at a lower P/E than AMTM.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 300469 | AMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥56.12 | $27.58 |
| Daily Change | 2.67% | 0.29% |
| 1-Year Return | 80.28% | 46.78% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥88.80 | $37.53 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥26.83 | $18.42 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥64.52 | $32.47 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥63.45 | $26.48 |
| Beta | 0.72 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 300469 | AMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.32B | $6.81B |
| Enterprise Value | $13.66B | $13.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $271.70M | $7.87B |
| Shares Outstanding | 248.24M | 243.94M |
| Float | 196.66M | 151.97M |
| Employees | 744 | 50,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | 300469 | AMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 69.75 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 11.63 |
| Price / Sales | 49.04 | 0.48 |
| Price / Book | 35.61 | 1.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | -17.90 | 10.82 |
Profitability
| Metric | 300469 | AMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -48.08% | 0.69% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -70.20% | 3.61% |
| Return on Equity | -31.79% | 1.78% |
| Return on Assets | -9.61% | 2.75% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.52 | -0.34 |
Growth
| Metric | 300469 | AMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -33.40% | -5.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -13.20% | 264.50% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 300469 | AMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.59 | 1.08 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.76 | 0.52 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.61 | 2.25 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5862 | 0.6200 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #20,128 |
Ownership
| Metric | 300469 | AMTM |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2483.30% | 214.70% |
| % Institutions | 71.30% | 10368.70% |
Compare 300469 to peers
Compare AMTM to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.