Sign up for free insights newsletter

300438 vs PRYMY: Guangzhou Great Power Energy&Technology Co Ltd vs Prysmian SPA ADR

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥68.98
+0.58%
China
$33.52B
PR
PRYMYUnited States
$71.79
+0.87%
United States
$32.37B

Quick Summary

Guangzhou Great Power Energy&Technology Co Ltd and Prysmian SPA ADR are similar in size. 300438 trades at a lower P/E than PRYMY. PRYMY pays a dividend; 300438 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric300438PRYMY
Current PriceCN¥68.98$71.79
Daily Change0.58%0.87%
1-Year Return193.28%178.90%
52-Week HighCN¥68.98$72.30
52-Week LowCN¥22.39$25.02
50-Day MACN¥52.78
200-Day MACN¥43.88
Beta0.000.84

Size & Revenue

Metric300438PRYMY
Market Cap$33.52B$32.37B
Enterprise Value$36.83B$19.32B
Revenue (TTM)$9.89B$20.13B
Shares Outstanding503.34M573.62M
Float328.26M286.78M
Employees11,021

Valuation

Metric300438PRYMY
Trailing P/E0.0021.76
Forward P/E0.00
Price / Sales3.391.61
Price / Book6.632.13
EV / EBITDA58.028.17

Profitability

Metric300438PRYMY
Profit Margin-2.01%6.31%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.38%13.65%
Return on Equity-4.56%21.64%
Return on Assets-0.98%6.25%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.392.56

Growth

Metric300438PRYMY
Revenue Growth (YoY)75.00%13.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)977.30%61.00%

Dividends

Metric300438PRYMY
Dividend Yield82.00%
Dividend / Share0.45

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric300438PRYMY
Sortino (Composite)6.947.06
Sharpe (Composite)3.5412.97
Calmar (Composite)11.9012.39
Hurst Exponent0.59280.6228
Piotroski F-Score3/9

Ownership

Metric300438PRYMY
% Insiders3375.50%0.00%
% Institutions755.10%0.03%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.