Home 300438 vs PRYMF 300438 vs PRYMF: Guangzhou Great Power Energy&Technology Co Ltd vs Prysmian S.p.A Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Guangzhou Great Power Energy&Technology Co Ltd and Prysmian S.p.A are similar in size. 300438 trades at a lower P/E than PRYMF. PRYMF pays a dividend; 300438 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 300438 PRYMF Current Price CN¥68.98 $141.00 Daily Change 0.58% 0.00% 1-Year Return 193.28% 169.52% 52-Week High CN¥68.98 $145.26 52-Week Low CN¥22.39 $51.41 50-Day MA CN¥52.78 — 200-Day MA CN¥43.88 — Beta 0.00 0.84
Size & Revenue Metric 300438 PRYMF Market Cap $33.52B $31.38B Enterprise Value $36.83B $34.72B Revenue (TTM) $9.89B $20.13B Shares Outstanding 503.34M 286.81M Float 328.26M 286.78M Employees 11,021 —
Valuation Metric 300438 PRYMF Trailing P/E 0.00 21.41 Forward P/E 0.00 — Price / Sales 3.39 1.56 Price / Book 6.63 4.20 EV / EBITDA 58.02 14.68
Profitability Metric 300438 PRYMF Profit Margin -2.01% 6.31% Operating Margin (TTM) 13.38% 13.65% Return on Equity -4.56% 21.64% Return on Assets -0.98% 6.25% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.39 5.11
Growth Metric 300438 PRYMF Revenue Growth (YoY) 75.00% 13.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) 977.30% 61.00%
Dividends Metric 300438 PRYMF Dividend Yield — 96.00% Dividend / Share — 1.05
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300438 PRYMF Sortino (Composite) 6.94 4.31 Sharpe (Composite) 3.54 8.64 Calmar (Composite) 11.90 7.21 Hurst Exponent 0.5928 0.5798 Piotroski F-Score 3/9 —
Ownership Metric 300438 PRYMF % Insiders 3375.50% 0.00% % Institutions 755.10% 64.98%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.