300188 vs 489790: Xiamen Meiya Pico Information vs HANWHA IND SOL LTD
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
30
300188•SHE
CN¥13.08
+4.31%
48
489790•KO
₩79,300.00
-0.63%
Quick Summary
HANWHA IND SOL LTD is 355.4× the market cap of Xiamen Meiya Pico Information. 489790 trades at a lower P/E than 300188.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 300188 | 489790 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥13.08 | ₩79,300.00 |
| Daily Change | 4.31% | -0.63% |
| 1-Year Return | 1.71% | 40.35% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥19.65 | ₩92,700.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥12.04 | ₩35,950.00 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥13.69 | ₩73,836.00 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥14.99 | ₩57,114.75 |
| Beta | 0.45 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 300188 | 489790 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.31B | $4.02T |
| Enterprise Value | $10.38B | $4.20T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $1.79T |
| Shares Outstanding | 859.48M | 50.38M |
| Float | 449.08M | 33.24M |
| Employees | 2,530 | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | 300188 | 489790 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 32.26 | 0.00 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 6.79 | 2.24 |
| Price / Book | 3.48 | 4.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 133.82 | 49.34 |
Profitability
| Metric | 300188 | 489790 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -32.32% | 2.55% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -67.31% | 6.65% |
| Return on Equity | -14.99% | 7.23% |
| Return on Assets | -5.09% | 5.97% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.62 | 0.00 |
Growth
| Metric | 300188 | 489790 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -31.90% | 0.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -44.50% | 0.00% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 300188 | 489790 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.50 | 2.06 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.14 | 3.49 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.60 | 4.18 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5752 | 0.5686 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #13,612 |
Ownership
| Metric | 300188 | 489790 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4755.60% | 3395.10% |
| % Institutions | 335.60% | 2831.70% |
Compare 300188 to peers
Compare 489790 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.