300130 vs 7962: Xgd Inc vs KING JIM CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
30
300130•SHE
CN¥23.84
+1.66%
7962•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥821.00
-0.48%
Quick Summary
KING JIM CO.,LTD. is 1.7× the market cap of Xgd Inc. 300130 pays a dividend; 7962 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 300130 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥23.84 | ¥821.00 |
| Daily Change | 1.66% | -0.48% |
| 1-Year Return | 9.46% | -3.42% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥38.00 | ¥876.60 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥20.93 | ¥806.00 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥25.01 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥27.35 | — |
| Beta | 0.53 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 300130 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.52B | $22.87B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.28B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.18B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 567.30M | — |
| Float | 390.50M | — |
| Employees | 1,571 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 300130 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 28.72 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 4.25 | — |
| Price / Book | 3.02 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.28 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 300130 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 14.74% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.94% | — |
| Return on Equity | 10.84% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.33% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.83 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 300130 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 19.10% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -48.70% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 300130 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.60 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 300130 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.75 | 0.08 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.64 | -0.01 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.87 | -0.58 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6344 | 0.5416 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #15,658 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 300130 | 7962 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3684.10% | — |
| % Institutions | 609.70% | — |
Compare 300130 to peers
Compare 7962 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.