300130 vs 7752: Xgd Inc vs RICOH COMPANY,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
30
300130•SHE
CN¥23.84
+1.66%
77
7752•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,406.00
-0.64%
Quick Summary
RICOH COMPANY,LTD. is 57.3× the market cap of Xgd Inc. 300130 pays a dividend; 7752 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 300130 | 7752 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥23.84 | ¥1,406.00 |
| Daily Change | 1.66% | -0.64% |
| 1-Year Return | 9.46% | -3.90% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥38.00 | ¥1,623.14 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥20.93 | ¥1,245.31 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥25.01 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥27.35 | — |
| Beta | 0.53 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 300130 | 7752 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.52B | $775.30B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.28B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.18B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 567.30M | — |
| Float | 390.50M | — |
| Employees | 1,571 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 300130 | 7752 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 28.72 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 4.25 | — |
| Price / Book | 3.02 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.28 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 300130 | 7752 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 14.74% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.94% | — |
| Return on Equity | 10.84% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.33% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.83 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 300130 | 7752 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 19.10% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -48.70% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 300130 | 7752 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.56% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.60 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 300130 | 7752 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.75 | 0.44 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.64 | 3.70 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.87 | 1.30 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6344 | 0.6098 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #15,658 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 300130 | 7752 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3684.10% | — |
| % Institutions | 609.70% | — |
Compare 300130 to peers
Compare 7752 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.