2880 vs 3816: Liaoning Port Co Ltd HK vs MISC
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
28
2880•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$0.85
-1.16%
38
3816•KLSE
MYR 8.17
+0.49%
Quick Summary
Liaoning Port Co Ltd HK is 1.1× the market cap of MISC. 2880 pays a dividend; 3816 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2880 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$0.85 | MYR 8.17 |
| Daily Change | -1.16% | 0.49% |
| 1-Year Return | 26.87% | 19.12% |
| 52-Week High | HK$1.08 | MYR 8.59 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$0.65 | MYR 6.74 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$0.91 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$0.88 | — |
| Beta | 0.47 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2880 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $39.66B | $35.71B |
| Enterprise Value | $43.09B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.36B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 5.16B | — |
| Float | 5.55B | — |
| Employees | 10,786 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2880 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 14.33 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.72 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 1.27 | — |
| Price / Sales | 3.49 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.44 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.42 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 2880 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 11.51% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.47% | — |
| Return on Equity | 3.67% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.77% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.06 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 2880 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.90% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -96.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2880 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.37% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.03 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2880 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.11 | 1.15 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.30 | 0.60 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -3.26 | 0.93 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6335 | 0.5279 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #18,595 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2880 | 3816 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 8322.30% | — |
| % Institutions | 17.30% | — |
Compare 2880 to peers
Compare 3816 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.