284740 vs 5834: Cuckoo Homesys Co Ltd vs SBI Leasing Services Co.,Ltd.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
28
284740•KO
₩25,050.00
+1.01%
58
5834•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥2,873.00
+2.31%
Quick Summary
Cuckoo Homesys Co Ltd is 11.4× the market cap of SBI Leasing Services Co.,Ltd.. 284740 pays a dividend; 5834 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 284740 | 5834 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ₩25,050.00 | ¥2,873.00 |
| Daily Change | 1.01% | 2.31% |
| 1-Year Return | 14.12% | -5.19% |
| 52-Week High | ₩31,150.00 | ¥7,020.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ₩21,700.00 | ¥2,517.00 |
| 50-Day MA | ₩24,565.00 | — |
| 200-Day MA | ₩25,447.75 | — |
| Beta | 0.56 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 284740 | 5834 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $556.07B | $48.79B |
| Enterprise Value | $444.74B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12T | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 22.42M | — |
| Float | 7.10M | — |
| Employees | 587 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 284740 | 5834 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.50 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.50 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 2.15 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 284740 | 5834 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 10.66% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.72% | — |
| Return on Equity | 11.54% | — |
| Return on Assets | 7.06% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.00 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 284740 | 5834 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -11.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 1.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 284740 | 5834 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.96% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1200.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 284740 | 5834 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.73 | 4.67 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 6.19 | 0.95 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.02 | -0.91 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6043 | 0.5596 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #5,568 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 284740 | 5834 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7011.60% | — |
| % Institutions | 1694.90% | — |
Compare 284740 to peers
Compare 5834 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.