2692 vs 373220: ZHAOWEI vs LG Energy Solution Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
26
2692•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$68.15
-0.94%
37
373220•KO
₩418,000.00
+0.48%
Quick Summary
LG Energy Solution Ltd is 3170.3× the market cap of ZHAOWEI. 373220 trades at a lower P/E than 2692.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2692 | 373220 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$68.15 | ₩418,000.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.94% | 0.48% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 23.67% |
| 52-Week High | HK$70.55 | ₩514,000.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$57.15 | ₩268,000.00 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$68.74 | ₩393,270.00 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$68.74 | ₩392,677.50 |
| Beta | 0.49 | 0.99 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2692 | 373220 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $30.65B | $97.17T |
| Enterprise Value | $28.73B | $111.00T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.72B | $23.67T |
| Shares Outstanding | 26.75M | 234.00M |
| Float | 111.69M | 47.16M |
| Employees | 2,381 | 12,433 |
Valuation
| Metric | 2692 | 373220 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 53.32 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 131.58 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 3.36 |
| Price / Sales | 17.87 | 4.10 |
| Price / Book | 4.56 | 4.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 66.47 | 22.67 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2692 | 373220 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 14.82% | -4.53% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.48% | 19.41% |
| Return on Equity | 7.58% | 0.27% |
| Return on Assets | 3.20% | 1.32% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Growth
| Metric | 2692 | 373220 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.50% | -17.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 10.50% | 85.60% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2692 | 373220 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 13.74 | 2.12 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 6.22 | 3.69 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.81 | 8.16 |
| Hurst Exponent | — | 0.6529 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #23,524 | #25,723 |
Ownership
| Metric | 2692 | 373220 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 1517.20% | 7984.90% |
| % Institutions | 2269.50% | 1173.60% |
Compare 2692 to peers
Compare 373220 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.