2669 vs 3231: China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd vs Nomura Real Estate Holdings,Inc.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
26
2669•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$4.07
-1.21%
3231•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,022.00
-1.83%
Quick Summary
Nomura Real Estate Holdings,Inc. is 65.6× the market cap of China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd. 2669 pays a dividend; 3231 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2669 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$4.07 | ¥1,022.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.21% | -1.83% |
| 1-Year Return | -23.06% | 16.52% |
| 52-Week High | HK$5.87 | ¥1,162.50 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$3.93 | ¥811.80 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$4.20 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$4.85 | — |
| Beta | 1.17 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2669 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.43B | $881.04B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.31B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.96B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.28B | — |
| Float | 1.27B | — |
| Employees | 38,042 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2669 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 8.52 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.26 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.90 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.99 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.00 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 2669 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 9.14% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.35% | — |
| Return on Equity | 24.81% | — |
| Return on Assets | 8.67% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.47 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 2669 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 9.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -22.70% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2669 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.21% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.17 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2669 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.89 | 0.49 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.06 | 0.30 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.76 | -0.39 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5668 | 0.5770 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #5,274 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2669 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6123.80% | — |
| % Institutions | 1308.30% | — |
Compare 2669 to peers
Compare 3231 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.