2646 vs 600029: STARLUX AIRLINES LTD vs China Southern Airlines Co Ltd Class A
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
26
2646•TW
NT$20.95
-1.41%
600029•SHG
CN¥5.71
-0.87%
Quick Summary
China Southern Airlines Co Ltd Class A is 1.6× the market cap of STARLUX AIRLINES LTD. 600029 trades at a lower P/E than 2646.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2646 | 600029 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | NT$20.95 | CN¥5.71 |
| Daily Change | -1.41% | -0.87% |
| 1-Year Return | -15.01% | -1.21% |
| 52-Week High | NT$26.40 | CN¥8.29 |
| 52-Week Low | NT$20.85 | CN¥5.61 |
| 50-Day MA | NT$22.07 | CN¥6.61 |
| 200-Day MA | NT$23.98 | CN¥6.63 |
| Beta | 0.04 | 0.51 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2646 | 600029 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $63.94B | $103.47B |
| Enterprise Value | $102.69B | $296.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44.05B | $182.26B |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.01B | 13.48B |
| Float | 1.23B | 5.43B |
| Employees | 5,935 | 108,176 |
Valuation
| Metric | 2646 | 600029 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 236.11 | 114.20 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 65.79 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.09 |
| Price / Sales | 1.45 | 0.57 |
| Price / Book | 2.01 | 2.93 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.97 | 7.14 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2646 | 600029 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.62% | 0.47% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 1.56% | -1.02% |
| Return on Equity | 0.89% | 4.99% |
| Return on Assets | 0.80% | 1.61% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.05 |
Growth
| Metric | 2646 | 600029 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 18.10% | 12.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 0.00% | -4.80% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2646 | 600029 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.50 | -0.86 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.13 | -0.60 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.15 | -1.01 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5258 | 0.5874 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #26,190 | #21,545 |
Ownership
| Metric | 2646 | 600029 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5927.90% | 7276.60% |
| % Institutions | 301.60% | 824.10% |
Compare 2646 to peers
Compare 600029 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.