2618 vs 600575: JD Logistics Inc vs Huaihe Energy Group Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
26
2618•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$15.87
-0.50%
60
600575•SHG
CN¥3.62
-1.09%
Quick Summary
JD Logistics Inc is 3.7× the market cap of Huaihe Energy Group Co Ltd. 2618 trades at a lower P/E than 600575.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2618 | 600575 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$15.87 | CN¥3.62 |
| Daily Change | -0.50% | -1.09% |
| 1-Year Return | 35.64% | -7.18% |
| 52-Week High | HK$15.95 | CN¥4.16 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$10.27 | CN¥3.34 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$12.70 | CN¥3.76 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$12.68 | CN¥3.58 |
| Beta | 0.50 | 0.24 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2618 | 600575 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $95.65B | $26.02B |
| Enterprise Value | $87.74B | $41.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217.15B | $38.82B |
| Shares Outstanding | 6.15B | 7.17B |
| Float | 1.93B | 1.43B |
| Employees | 682,705 | 7,152 |
Valuation
| Metric | 2618 | 600575 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 13.07 | 15.13 |
| Forward P/E | 9.19 | 0.00 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.58 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.44 | 0.67 |
| Price / Book | 1.50 | 1.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.30 | 8.73 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2618 | 600575 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 3.06% | 4.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 2.98% | 7.98% |
| Return on Equity | 11.23% | 8.16% |
| Return on Assets | 2.70% | 2.84% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.24 |
Growth
| Metric | 2618 | 600575 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 21.90% | 13.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 12.90% | 4.20% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2618 | 600575 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 10.43 | -0.52 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.85 | -0.77 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 8.23 | -2.02 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5424 | 0.6212 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #16,221 | #17,414 |
Ownership
| Metric | 2618 | 600575 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7160.20% | 8114.00% |
| % Institutions | 707.20% | 121.00% |
Compare 2618 to peers
Compare 600575 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.