2615 vs MIHDF: Wan Hai Lines Ltd vs MISC Berhad
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
2615•TW
NT$75.30
-2.08%
MI
MIHDF•United States
N/A
Quick Summary
Wan Hai Lines Ltd is 33.3× the market cap of MISC Berhad. 2615 trades at a lower P/E than MIHDF.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2615 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | NT$75.30 | — |
| Daily Change | -2.08% | — |
| 1-Year Return | -9.50% | — |
| 52-Week High | NT$126.50 | — |
| 52-Week Low | NT$73.30 | — |
| 50-Day MA | NT$77.16 | — |
| 200-Day MA | NT$80.69 | — |
| Beta | 0.98 | 0.03 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2615 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $215.79B | $6.47B |
| Enterprise Value | $155.99B | $15.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140.35B | $11.15B |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.81B | 4.46B |
| Float | 1.55B | 2.00B |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2615 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 6.87 | 14.50 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | -3.74 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.54 | 0.58 |
| Price / Book | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| EV / EBITDA | 2.92 | 3.17 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2615 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 22.42% | 15.25% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.66% | 25.96% |
| Return on Equity | 11.72% | 4.76% |
| Return on Assets | 4.97% | 3.06% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 11.20 | 0.10 |
Growth
| Metric | 2615 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -19.60% | -15.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -21.40% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2615 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2615 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.62 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.43 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | -2.45 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6605 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #5,452 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2615 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4523.30% | 54.46% |
| % Institutions | 996.90% | 37.67% |
Compare 2615 to peers
Compare MIHDF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.