2613 vs HTCO: China Container Terminal Corp vs Caravelle International Group
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
26
NT$23.00
-0.43%
HT
HTCO•United States
$10.87
-2.16%
Quick Summary
China Container Terminal Corp is 53.6× the market cap of Caravelle International Group. 2613 pays a dividend; HTCO does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2613 | HTCO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | NT$23.00 | $10.87 |
| Daily Change | -0.43% | -2.16% |
| 1-Year Return | -27.22% | 888.18% |
| 52-Week High | NT$34.00 | $15.38 |
| 52-Week Low | NT$22.95 | $0.18 |
| 50-Day MA | NT$24.44 | — |
| 200-Day MA | NT$25.24 | — |
| Beta | 0.49 | -0.52 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2613 | HTCO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $59.16M |
| Enterprise Value | $7.95B | $48.62M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.37B | $95.26M |
| Shares Outstanding | 137.28M | 7.29M |
| Float | 64.40M | 2.74M |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2613 | HTCO |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 20.26 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.94 | 0.28 |
| Price / Book | 0.96 | 6.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.42 | -2.44 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2613 | HTCO |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 4.67% | -10.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.95% | -6.53% |
| Return on Equity | 4.87% | -188.50% |
| Return on Assets | 2.19% | -40.43% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.14 | -4.18 |
Growth
| Metric | 2613 | HTCO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 1.80% | 56.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -0.30% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2613 | HTCO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.35% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2613 | HTCO |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.70 | 1.03 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.47 | 0.65 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.89 | 4.29 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5537 | 0.5373 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2613 | HTCO |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4411.50% | 51.50% |
| % Institutions | 66.00% | 0.01% |
Compare 2613 to peers
Compare HTCO to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.