2609 vs MIHDF: Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp vs MISC Berhad
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
NT$50.70
-0.59%
MI
MIHDF•United States
N/A
Quick Summary
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp is 27.5× the market cap of MISC Berhad. 2609 trades at a lower P/E than MIHDF. 2609 pays a dividend; MIHDF does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2609 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | NT$50.70 | — |
| Daily Change | -0.59% | — |
| 1-Year Return | -29.68% | — |
| 52-Week High | NT$86.90 | — |
| 52-Week Low | NT$50.40 | — |
| 50-Day MA | NT$55.18 | — |
| 200-Day MA | NT$56.39 | — |
| Beta | 0.89 | 0.03 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2609 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $178.10B | $6.47B |
| Enterprise Value | $24.77B | $15.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $163.56B | $11.15B |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.49B | 4.46B |
| Float | 2.35B | 2.00B |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2609 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 10.43 | 14.50 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.19 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.09 | 0.58 |
| Price / Book | 0.55 | 0.77 |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.53 | 3.17 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2609 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 10.45% | 15.25% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -2.15% | 25.96% |
| Return on Equity | 5.20% | 4.76% |
| Return on Assets | 1.96% | 3.06% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 4.89 | 0.10 |
Growth
| Metric | 2609 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -30.30% | -15.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -81.70% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2609 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.88% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 2.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2609 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.93 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.72 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.01 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.7083 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #12,607 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2609 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 1963.10% | 54.46% |
| % Institutions | 3343.50% | 37.67% |
Compare 2609 to peers
Compare MIHDF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.