2588 vs 4260: BOC Aviation Ltd vs United International Transporta
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
25
2588•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$82.10
-1.91%
42
4260•TADAWUL
SAR 41.52
+1.86%
Quick Summary
BOC Aviation Ltd is 12.3× the market cap of United International Transporta. 2588 pays a dividend; 4260 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2588 | 4260 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$82.10 | SAR 41.52 |
| Daily Change | -1.91% | 1.86% |
| 1-Year Return | 43.41% | -25.87% |
| 52-Week High | HK$91.95 | SAR 58.31 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$57.30 | SAR 38.68 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$82.40 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$75.22 | — |
| Beta | 0.83 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2588 | 4260 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $58.30B | $4.73B |
| Enterprise Value | $188.41B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.30B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 694.01M | — |
| Float | 206.86M | — |
| Employees | 211 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2588 | 4260 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 9.49 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.53 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 3.71 | — |
| Price / Sales | 25.39 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.07 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.96 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 2588 | 4260 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 34.29% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 59.95% | — |
| Return on Equity | 11.93% | — |
| Return on Assets | 3.33% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.49 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 2588 | 4260 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -4.20% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2588 | 4260 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.45 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2588 | 4260 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.79 | -0.91 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.51 | 2.59 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 7.39 | -0.88 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6839 | 0.5321 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #23,203 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2588 | 4260 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7019.40% | — |
| % Institutions | 1812.40% | — |
Compare 2588 to peers
Compare 4260 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.