Home 2548 vs CRBJF 2548 vs CRBJF: Huaku Development Co Ltd vs China Resources Land Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary Huaku Development Co Ltd is 1.4× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. CRBJF trades at a lower P/E than 2548. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 2548 CRBJF Current Price NT$130.00 $3.80 Daily Change 1.17% 0.00% 1-Year Return 27.45% — 52-Week High NT$130.00 $3.98 52-Week Low NT$94.40 $3.80 50-Day MA NT$115.42 — 200-Day MA NT$106.60 — Beta -0.02 —
Size & Revenue Metric 2548 CRBJF Market Cap $41.06B $28.38B Enterprise Value $54.16B $374.32B Revenue (TTM) $18.24B $281.44B Shares Outstanding 319.52M 7.13B Float 257.41M 2.89B Employees 0 —
Valuation Metric 2548 CRBJF Trailing P/E 14.62 7.37 Forward P/E 0.00 — PEG Ratio -0.43 — Price / Sales 2.25 0.10 Price / Book 1.85 0.68 EV / EBITDA 12.55 8.09
Profitability Metric 2548 CRBJF Profit Margin 17.77% 9.03% Operating Margin (TTM) 24.04% 14.59% Return on Equity 14.98% 8.04% Return on Assets 4.49% 2.56% Diluted EPS (TTM) 8.79 0.54
Growth Metric 2548 CRBJF Revenue Growth (YoY) 29049.30% -6.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -73.70% -11.70%
Dividends Metric 2548 CRBJF Dividend Yield 0.00% 462.00% Dividend / Share 0.00 0.18
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 2548 CRBJF Sortino (Composite) 7.72 — Sharpe (Composite) 3.06 — Calmar (Composite) 10.14 — Hurst Exponent 0.6225 — Piotroski F-Score 8/9 — Magic Formula Rank #10,052 —
Ownership Metric 2548 CRBJF % Insiders 1779.90% 59.55% % Institutions 1557.20% 17.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.