Sign up for free insights newsletter

2542 vs CRBJF: Highwealth Construction Corp vs China Resources Land Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

NT$34.95
-0.99%
Taiwan
$75.26B
CR
CRBJFUnited States
$3.80
+0.00%
United States
$28.38B

Quick Summary

Highwealth Construction Corp is 2.7× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. CRBJF trades at a lower P/E than 2542. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric2542CRBJF
Current PriceNT$34.95$3.80
Daily Change-0.99%0.00%
1-Year Return-12.62%
52-Week HighNT$46.75$3.98
52-Week LowNT$34.80$3.80
50-Day MANT$36.97
200-Day MANT$38.82
Beta0.10

Size & Revenue

Metric2542CRBJF
Market Cap$75.26B$28.38B
Enterprise Value$210.77B$374.32B
Revenue (TTM)$31.06B$281.44B
Shares Outstanding2.13B7.13B
Float1.37B2.89B
Employees0

Valuation

Metric2542CRBJF
Trailing P/E16.817.37
Forward P/E4.59
PEG Ratio0.92
Price / Sales2.420.10
Price / Book1.430.68
EV / EBITDA27.438.09

Profitability

Metric2542CRBJF
Profit Margin14.29%9.03%
Operating Margin (TTM)27.38%14.59%
Return on Equity8.67%8.04%
Return on Assets1.54%2.56%
Diluted EPS (TTM)2.100.54

Growth

Metric2542CRBJF
Revenue Growth (YoY)36.90%-6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-24.90%-11.70%

Dividends

Metric2542CRBJF
Dividend Yield0.00%462.00%
Dividend / Share0.000.18

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric2542CRBJF
Sortino (Composite)-1.00
Sharpe (Composite)-0.87
Calmar (Composite)-2.49
Hurst Exponent0.5463
Piotroski F-Score1/9
Magic Formula Rank#18,958

Ownership

Metric2542CRBJF
% Insiders3542.70%59.55%
% Institutions825.80%17.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.