Home 2539 vs CTRYQ 2539 vs CTRYQ: Sakura Development Co Ltd vs Country Garden Holdings Co. Ltd. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary Sakura Development Co Ltd is 34.5× the market cap of Country Garden Holdings Co. Ltd.. CTRYQ trades at a lower P/E than 2539. 2539 pays a dividend; CTRYQ does not.
Price & Performance Metric 2539 CTRYQ Current Price NT$46.70 $0.03 Daily Change -0.53% 0.00% 1-Year Return -26.46% 4471.43% 52-Week High NT$69.20 $0.15 52-Week Low NT$43.60 $0.00 50-Day MA NT$48.33 $0.01 200-Day MA NT$49.49 $0.03 Beta 0.16 2.68
Size & Revenue Metric 2539 CTRYQ Market Cap $56.02B $1.62B Enterprise Value $56.80B $37.19B Revenue (TTM) $14.00B $223.22B Shares Outstanding 1.19B 42.20B Float 357.42M 16.23B Employees 111 17,920
Valuation Metric 2539 CTRYQ Trailing P/E 13.57 0.00 Forward P/E 23.87 3.80 PEG Ratio 0.00 — Price / Sales 4.00 0.01 Price / Book 3.15 0.16 EV / EBITDA 11.07 -0.47
Profitability Metric 2539 CTRYQ Profit Margin 29.45% -17.50% Operating Margin (TTM) 39.40% -14.81% Return on Equity 25.62% -81.11% Return on Assets 9.87% -1.01% Diluted EPS (TTM) 3.46 -0.21
Growth Metric 2539 CTRYQ Revenue Growth (YoY) -43.50% -28.90% Earnings Growth (YoY) -46.40% 0.00%
Dividends Metric 2539 CTRYQ Dividend Yield 1.27% — Dividend / Share 0.60 —
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 2539 CTRYQ Sortino (Composite) -1.59 11.70 Sharpe (Composite) -1.61 10.59 Calmar (Composite) -3.97 25.00 Hurst Exponent 0.5889 0.5047 Piotroski F-Score 7/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #5,676 —
Ownership Metric 2539 CTRYQ % Insiders 7342.30% 4113.90% % Institutions 175.60% 519.90%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.