Sign up for free insights newsletter

2539 vs CRBJY: Sakura Development Co Ltd vs China Resources Land Ltd ADR

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

NT$46.70
-0.53%
Taiwan
$56.02B
China Resources Land Ltd ADR
CRBJYUnited States
$39.45
+0.00%
United States
$27.59B

Quick Summary

Sakura Development Co Ltd is 2.0× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd ADR. CRBJY trades at a lower P/E than 2539. CRBJY offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric2539CRBJY
Current PriceNT$46.70$39.45
Daily Change-0.53%0.00%
1-Year Return-26.46%14.19%
52-Week HighNT$69.20$40.25
52-Week LowNT$43.60$32.78
50-Day MANT$48.33$36.07
200-Day MANT$49.49$36.47
Beta0.160.60

Size & Revenue

Metric2539CRBJY
Market Cap$56.02B$27.59B
Enterprise Value$56.80B$50.89B
Revenue (TTM)$14.00B$294.53B
Shares Outstanding1.19B713.09M
Float357.42M2.88B
Employees11160,740

Valuation

Metric2539CRBJY
Trailing P/E13.576.71
Forward P/E23.875.77
PEG Ratio0.000.62
Price / Sales4.000.09
Price / Book3.150.66
EV / EBITDA11.075.54

Profitability

Metric2539CRBJY
Profit Margin29.45%9.25%
Operating Margin (TTM)39.40%18.97%
Return on Equity25.62%8.91%
Return on Assets9.87%2.72%
Diluted EPS (TTM)3.465.58

Growth

Metric2539CRBJY
Revenue Growth (YoY)-43.50%19.90%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-46.40%16.20%

Dividends

Metric2539CRBJY
Dividend Yield1.27%3.52%
Dividend / Share0.601.32

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric2539CRBJY
Sortino (Composite)-1.590.21
Sharpe (Composite)-1.611.71
Calmar (Composite)-3.970.35
Hurst Exponent0.58890.4719
Piotroski F-Score7/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#5,676#8,915

Ownership

Metric2539CRBJY
% Insiders7342.30%0.00%
% Institutions175.60%0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.