2501 vs CHVKY: Cathay Real Estate Development Co Ltd vs China Vanke Co. Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
NT$24.45
-1.21%
CH
CHVKY•United States
$0.17
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Cathay Real Estate Development Co Ltd is 3.0× the market cap of China Vanke Co. Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2501 | CHVKY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | NT$24.45 | $0.17 |
| Daily Change | -1.21% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 30.40% | -55.14% |
| 52-Week High | NT$24.95 | $0.40 |
| 52-Week Low | NT$18.25 | $0.14 |
| 50-Day MA | NT$22.98 | — |
| 200-Day MA | NT$22.21 | — |
| Beta | 0.16 | 0.82 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2501 | CHVKY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.41B | $9.35B |
| Enterprise Value | $56.44B | $448.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.29B | $284.67B |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.16B | 19.45B |
| Float | 930.66M | 8.68B |
| Employees | 0 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2501 | CHVKY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 8.66 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.83 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.73 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.17 | 0.03 |
| Price / Book | 0.93 | 0.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.25 | -32.69 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2501 | CHVKY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 13.51% | -20.92% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.13% | -11.80% |
| Return on Equity | 10.42% | -17.93% |
| Return on Assets | 2.87% | -0.88% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 2.83 | -0.36 |
Growth
| Metric | 2501 | CHVKY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.80% | -27.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 76.90% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2501 | CHVKY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2501 | CHVKY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.24 | -0.72 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.27 | -0.38 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 7.24 | -0.83 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6384 | 0.5556 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #12,830 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2501 | CHVKY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5421.60% | — |
| % Institutions | 1173.40% | — |
Compare 2501 to peers
Compare CHVKY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.