2423 vs 3231: Ke Holdings Inc vs Nomura Real Estate Holdings,Inc.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
24
2423•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$42.30
-1.76%
3231•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,022.00
-1.83%
Quick Summary
Nomura Real Estate Holdings,Inc. is 6.1× the market cap of Ke Holdings Inc. 2423 pays a dividend; 3231 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2423 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$42.30 | ¥1,022.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.76% | -1.83% |
| 1-Year Return | -18.58% | 16.52% |
| 52-Week High | HK$55.30 | ¥1,162.50 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$37.66 | ¥811.80 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$43.11 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$45.93 | — |
| Beta | -0.53 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2423 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $143.45B | $881.04B |
| Enterprise Value | $108.06B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94.58B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.21B | — |
| Float | 2.04B | — |
| Employees | 119,245 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2423 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 43.21 | — |
| Forward P/E | 16.89 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.69 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.52 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.85 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.29 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 2423 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 3.17% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -0.65% | — |
| Return on Equity | 4.34% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.11% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.44 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 2423 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -28.70% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -83.70% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2423 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.60% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.93 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2423 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.45 | 0.49 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.54 | 0.30 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.20 | -0.39 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6316 | 0.5770 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #24,367 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2423 | 3231 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3839.30% | — |
| % Institutions | 1680.80% | — |
Compare 2423 to peers
Compare 3231 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.