2384 vs 6936: SBS Holdings,Inc. vs S.F. Holding Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

2384•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,155.00
-1.31%
69
6936•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$35.48
-1.39%
Quick Summary
S.F. Holding Co Ltd is 1.4× the market cap of SBS Holdings,Inc.. 6936 pays a dividend; 2384 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2384 | 6936 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,155.00 | HK$35.48 |
| Daily Change | -1.31% | -1.39% |
| 1-Year Return | 48.77% | 0.23% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,415.00 | HK$46.80 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,651.07 | HK$33.32 |
| 50-Day MA | — | HK$35.30 |
| 200-Day MA | — | HK$37.81 |
| Beta | — | 0.52 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2384 | 6936 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $153.71B | $219.49B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $221.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $308.23B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 240.00M |
| Float | — | 2.47B |
| Employees | — | 158,761 |
Valuation
| Metric | 2384 | 6936 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 14.02 |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.15 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.19 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.71 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.55 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 5.86 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2384 | 6936 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 3.61% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 4.64% |
| Return on Equity | — | 10.99% |
| Return on Assets | — | 4.26% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 2.25 |
Growth
| Metric | 2384 | 6936 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 7.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 4.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | 2384 | 6936 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.53% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.89 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2384 | 6936 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.16 | 0.55 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.32 | 0.21 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.75 | 4.43 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5667 | 0.5337 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #11,687 |
Ownership
| Metric | 2384 | 6936 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 612.50% |
| % Institutions | — | 4645.80% |
Compare 2384 to peers
Compare 6936 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.