2337 vs 2423: Ichigo Inc. vs Ke Holdings Inc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
2337•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥514.00
+2.80%
24
2423•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$42.30
-1.76%
Quick Summary
Ichigo Inc. is 1.2× the market cap of Ke Holdings Inc. 2423 pays a dividend; 2337 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2337 | 2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥514.00 | HK$42.30 |
| Daily Change | 2.80% | -1.76% |
| 1-Year Return | 33.85% | -18.58% |
| 52-Week High | ¥514.00 | HK$55.30 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥363.00 | HK$37.66 |
| 50-Day MA | — | HK$43.11 |
| 200-Day MA | — | HK$45.93 |
| Beta | — | -0.53 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2337 | 2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $165.12B | $143.45B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $108.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $94.58B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 3.21B |
| Float | — | 2.04B |
| Employees | — | 119,245 |
Valuation
| Metric | 2337 | 2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 43.21 |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.89 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.69 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.52 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 42.29 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2337 | 2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 3.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | -0.65% |
| Return on Equity | — | 4.34% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.11% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.44 |
Growth
| Metric | 2337 | 2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -28.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -83.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 2337 | 2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 4.60% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 1.93 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2337 | 2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 9.75 | 1.75 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 6.28 | 0.71 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 5.44 | 0.77 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5819 | 0.6316 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #24,388 |
Ownership
| Metric | 2337 | 2423 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 3839.30% |
| % Institutions | — | 1680.80% |
Compare 2337 to peers
Compare 2423 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.