2331 vs 300448: ALSOK CO.,LTD. vs Guangzhou Haoyun Security Technologies Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
2331•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,242.00
+1.26%
30
CN¥6.72
-1.47%
Quick Summary
ALSOK CO.,LTD. is 124.2× the market cap of Guangzhou Haoyun Security Technologies Co Ltd. 300448 pays a dividend; 2331 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2331 | 300448 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥1,242.00 | CN¥6.72 |
| Daily Change | 1.26% | -1.47% |
| 1-Year Return | 10.76% | 11.26% |
| 52-Week High | ¥1,304.50 | CN¥11.21 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥985.46 | CN¥5.94 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥9.63 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥7.74 |
| Beta | — | 0.59 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2331 | 300448 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $598.39B | $4.82B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $4.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $418.77M |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 676.52M |
| Float | — | 433.03M |
| Employees | — | 638 |
Valuation
| Metric | 2331 | 300448 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 11.50 |
| Price / Book | — | 4.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | -179.64 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2331 | 300448 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | -16.06% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | -33.10% |
| Return on Equity | — | -6.51% |
| Return on Assets | — | -4.41% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | -0.10 |
Growth
| Metric | 2331 | 300448 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -48.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 14.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 2331 | 300448 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.47% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.03 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2331 | 300448 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.23 | -0.39 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.85 | -0.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.63 | -0.26 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6425 | 0.5001 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
Ownership
| Metric | 2331 | 300448 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 3520.20% |
| % Institutions | — | 42.60% |
Compare 2331 to peers
Compare 300448 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.