2208 vs 6273: Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd vs SMC CORPORATION
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
22
2208•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$15.51
+1.37%
6273•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥70,100.00
-2.56%
Quick Summary
SMC CORPORATION is 31.9× the market cap of Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd. 2208 pays a dividend; 6273 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2208 | 6273 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$15.51 | ¥70,100.00 |
| Daily Change | 1.37% | -2.56% |
| 1-Year Return | 250.11% | 63.34% |
| 52-Week High | HK$17.32 | ¥76,000.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$4.46 | ¥41,839.89 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$14.42 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$12.48 | — |
| Beta | 0.81 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2208 | 6273 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $118.82B | $3.79T |
| Enterprise Value | $140.64B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73.02B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 773.57M | — |
| Float | 2.88B | — |
| Employees | 11,890 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 2208 | 6273 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 20.52 | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.08 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.88 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.63 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.28 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.40 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 2208 | 6273 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 3.80% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 4.74% | — |
| Return on Equity | 6.91% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.46% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.59 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 2208 | 6273 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 19.30% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 161.80% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 2208 | 6273 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.20 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2208 | 6273 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.93 | 4.32 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.66 | 2.31 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 4.98 | 8.98 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5560 | 0.5798 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #22,505 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 2208 | 6273 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 1.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 4228.00% | — |
Compare 2208 to peers
Compare 6273 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.