2168 vs MMS: Pasona Group Inc. vs Mcmillan Shakespeare Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
21
2168•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,790.00
+1.30%
MM
MMS•Australian Securities Exchange
A$15.73
+2.08%
Quick Summary
Pasona Group Inc. is 72.1× the market cap of Mcmillan Shakespeare Ltd. MMS pays a dividend; 2168 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 2168 | MMS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥1,790.00 | A$15.73 |
| Daily Change | 1.30% | 2.08% |
| 1-Year Return | -15.09% | 8.41% |
| 52-Week High | ¥2,492.00 | A$19.79 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,767.00 | A$13.70 |
| 50-Day MA | — | A$15.67 |
| 200-Day MA | — | A$16.87 |
| Beta | — | 0.64 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 2168 | MMS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $76.91B | $1.07B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $1.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $584.05M |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 69.64M |
| Float | — | 57.50M |
| Employees | — | 1,311 |
Valuation
| Metric | 2168 | MMS |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 10.63 |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.22 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.93 |
| Price / Sales | — | 1.83 |
| Price / Book | — | 9.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 6.90 |
Profitability
| Metric | 2168 | MMS |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 17.04% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 31.61% |
| Return on Equity | — | 88.07% |
| Return on Assets | — | 7.68% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.44 |
Growth
| Metric | 2168 | MMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 7.40% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 9.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | 2168 | MMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 9.12% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 1.39 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 2168 | MMS |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.20 | 4.63 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.96 | 5.47 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -2.37 | -0.44 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5402 | 0.6668 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #20,802 |
Ownership
| Metric | 2168 | MMS |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 1735.90% |
| % Institutions | — | 3534.50% |
Compare 2168 to peers
Compare MMS to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.