Home 2039 vs AIAGF 2039 vs AIAGF: China International Marine Containers Group Co Ltd vs Aurubis AG Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
20
2039 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary China International Marine Containers Group Co Ltd is 6.7× the market cap of Aurubis AG. AIAGF trades at a lower P/E than 2039. 2039 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 2039 AIAGF Current Price HK$10.70 $200.00 Daily Change -3.08% 0.00% 1-Year Return 128.14% 158.23% 52-Week High HK$12.63 $200.00 52-Week Low HK$4.74 $77.45 50-Day MA HK$10.71 $163.16 200-Day MA HK$8.72 $119.17 Beta 1.04 1.23
Size & Revenue Metric 2039 AIAGF Market Cap $62.11B $9.24B Enterprise Value $75.15B $8.03B Revenue (TTM) $156.61B $19.30B Shares Outstanding 3.09B 43.66M Float 2.25B 30.23M Employees 20,404 7,228
Valuation Metric 2039 AIAGF Trailing P/E 530.00 12.53 Forward P/E 16.92 8.96 PEG Ratio 0.00 0.00 Price / Sales 0.40 0.48 Price / Book 0.99 1.42 EV / EBITDA 7.77 6.46
Profitability Metric 2039 AIAGF Profit Margin 0.14% 3.14% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.22% 8.03% Return on Equity 1.98% 11.90% Return on Assets 2.30% 5.28% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.03 15.96
Growth Metric 2039 AIAGF Revenue Growth (YoY) -18.80% 25.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) -68.10% 25.40%
Dividends Metric 2039 AIAGF Dividend Yield 1.69% 0.80% Dividend / Share 0.18 1.60
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 2039 AIAGF Sortino (Composite) 4.01 40.53 Sharpe (Composite) 2.05 2.74 Calmar (Composite) 7.17 31.61 Hurst Exponent 0.5589 0.5687 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #14,414 #10,953
Ownership Metric 2039 AIAGF % Insiders 7922.60% 3853.20% % Institutions 1052.80% 4422.60%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.