Sign up for free insights newsletter

200429 vs 601107: Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd vs Sichuan Expressway Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥6.01
-0.33%
China
$18.35B

Quick Summary

Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd is 1.4× the market cap of Sichuan Expressway Co Ltd. 200429 trades at a lower P/E than 601107. 200429 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric200429601107
Current PriceHK$8.93CN¥6.01
Daily Change0.00%-0.33%
1-Year Return14.49%6.18%
52-Week HighHK$9.18CN¥6.58
52-Week LowHK$7.81CN¥5.48
50-Day MAHK$8.92CN¥6.21
200-Day MAHK$8.65CN¥5.97
Beta-0.060.50

Size & Revenue

Metric200429601107
Market Cap$26.51B$18.35B
Enterprise Value$33.49B$52.99B
Revenue (TTM)$4.47B$8.76B
Shares Outstanding348.75M2.16B
Float842.43M1.07B
Employees3,0294,548

Valuation

Metric200429601107
Trailing P/E9.0212.77
Forward P/E11.896.21
PEG Ratio0.000.71
Price / Sales5.932.10
Price / Book1.460.92
EV / EBITDA6.7414.01

Profitability

Metric200429601107
Profit Margin40.30%17.28%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.84%13.77%
Return on Equity18.17%7.58%
Return on Assets6.74%2.38%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.990.47

Growth

Metric200429601107
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.70%-11.00%
Earnings Growth (YoY)22.00%-41.80%

Dividends

Metric200429601107
Dividend Yield6.76%4.93%
Dividend / Share0.600.30

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric200429601107
Sortino (Composite)3.940.07
Sharpe (Composite)1.924.89
Calmar (Composite)4.35-0.17
Hurst Exponent0.62660.6195
Piotroski F-Score5/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#8,850#19,647

Ownership

Metric200429601107
% Insiders378.50%8104.40%
% Institutions553.00%302.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.