Sign up for free insights newsletter

200429 vs 600377: Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd vs Jiangsu Expressway Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥11.75
-0.34%
China
$59.19B

Quick Summary

Jiangsu Expressway Co Ltd is 2.2× the market cap of Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd. 200429 trades at a lower P/E than 600377. 200429 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric200429600377
Current PriceHK$8.93CN¥11.75
Daily Change0.00%-0.34%
1-Year Return14.49%-24.44%
52-Week HighHK$9.18CN¥16.36
52-Week LowHK$7.81CN¥11.50
50-Day MAHK$8.92CN¥12.03
200-Day MAHK$8.65CN¥12.86
Beta-0.060.46

Size & Revenue

Metric200429600377
Market Cap$26.51B$59.19B
Enterprise Value$33.49B$82.52B
Revenue (TTM)$4.47B$20.29B
Shares Outstanding348.75M3.82B
Float842.43M1.69B
Employees3,0294,463

Valuation

Metric200429600377
Trailing P/E9.0212.91
Forward P/E11.8910.87
PEG Ratio0.003.81
Price / Sales5.932.92
Price / Book1.461.43
EV / EBITDA6.748.65

Profitability

Metric200429600377
Profit Margin40.30%22.64%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.84%12.30%
Return on Equity18.17%9.21%
Return on Assets6.74%3.83%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.990.91

Growth

Metric200429600377
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.70%-20.00%
Earnings Growth (YoY)22.00%-8.50%

Dividends

Metric200429600377
Dividend Yield6.76%4.16%
Dividend / Share0.600.49

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric200429600377
Sortino (Composite)3.943.36
Sharpe (Composite)1.920.10
Calmar (Composite)4.35-1.48
Hurst Exponent0.62660.7354
Piotroski F-Score5/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#8,850#14,583

Ownership

Metric200429600377
% Insiders378.50%8731.30%
% Institutions553.00%323.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.