200011 vs 601155: Shenzhen Properties & Resources Development Group Ltd vs Seazen Holdings Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.
HK$2.78
+0.00%
60
601155•SHG
CN¥14.71
+3.45%
Quick Summary
Seazen Holdings Co Ltd is 6.4× the market cap of Shenzhen Properties & Resources Development Group Ltd.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 200011 | 601155 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$2.78 | CN¥14.71 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 3.45% |
| 1-Year Return | 6.92% | 7.06% |
| 52-Week High | HK$3.67 | CN¥18.08 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$2.59 | CN¥12.20 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥15.52 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥15.15 |
| Beta | 0.67 | 1.82 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 200011 | 601155 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.11B | $32.82B |
| Enterprise Value | $8.40B | $79.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.13B | $53.01B |
| Shares Outstanding | 67.61M | 2.26B |
| Float | 251.32M | 736.39M |
| Employees | — | 19,935 |
Valuation
| Metric | 200011 | 601155 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 48.50 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | 1.63 | 0.62 |
| Price / Book | 0.47 | 0.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | -9.83 | 13.99 |
Profitability
| Metric | 200011 | 601155 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -34.68% | 1.28% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 6.86% | 10.32% |
| Return on Equity | -32.33% | 0.55% |
| Return on Assets | -3.60% | 1.29% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -2.06 | 0.30 |
Growth
| Metric | 200011 | 601155 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 36.00% | -50.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -43.30% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 200011 | 601155 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.92 | 0.37 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.93 | 5.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -2.90 | 0.97 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5619 | 0.6217 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #19,034 |
Ownership
| Metric | 200011 | 601155 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5.09% | 6943.40% |
| % Institutions | 0.00% | 707.10% |
Compare 200011 to peers
Compare 601155 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.