1997 vs AMOT: Wharf Real Estate Investment Co Ltd vs AMOT INVESTMENTS
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
19
1997•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$24.12
-0.99%
AM
AMOT•TASE
ILA 2,133.00
+3.49%
Quick Summary
Wharf Real Estate Investment Co Ltd is 6.1× the market cap of AMOT INVESTMENTS. 1997 pays a dividend; AMOT does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1997 | AMOT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$24.12 | ILA 2,133.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.99% | 3.49% |
| 1-Year Return | 34.30% | 10.83% |
| 52-Week High | HK$28.90 | ILA 2,691.42 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$18.08 | ILA 1,870.00 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$25.89 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$24.42 | — |
| Beta | 0.77 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1997 | AMOT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $72.69B | $11.89B |
| Enterprise Value | $104.00B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.81B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 3.04B | — |
| Float | 1.60B | — |
| Employees | 2,900 | 179 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1997 | AMOT |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.64 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.20 | — |
| Price / Sales | 5.67 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.40 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 46.03 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1997 | AMOT |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -33.22% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 72.80% | — |
| Return on Equity | -2.30% | — |
| Return on Assets | 2.50% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.15 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1997 | AMOT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.00% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -34.40% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1997 | AMOT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.56% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.32 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1997 | AMOT |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.98 | -0.07 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.25 | 3.49 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.73 | 1.14 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6345 | 0.6172 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #15,482 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1997 | AMOT |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4905.90% | — |
| % Institutions | 1283.30% | — |
Compare 1997 to peers
Compare AMOT to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.