1979 vs BEAN: Taikisha Ltd. vs Belimo Holding
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
19
1979•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,490.00
-0.57%
BE
BEAN•SIX Swiss Exchange
CHF 769.00
+4.70%
Quick Summary
Taikisha Ltd. is 25.5× the market cap of Belimo Holding. BEAN pays a dividend; 1979 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1979 | BEAN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,490.00 | CHF 769.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.57% | 4.70% |
| 1-Year Return | 55.53% | 42.28% |
| 52-Week High | ¥3,925.00 | CHF 953.50 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,221.26 | CHF 536.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CHF 746.12 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CHF 813.76 |
| Beta | — | 1.06 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1979 | BEAN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $222.39B | $8.73B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $8.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.12B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 12.30M |
| Float | — | 12.06M |
| Employees | — | 2,386 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1979 | BEAN |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 47.94 |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.32 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.41 |
| Price / Sales | — | 7.79 |
| Price / Book | — | 14.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 32.75 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1979 | BEAN |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 16.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 18.73% |
| Return on Equity | — | 30.21% |
| Return on Assets | — | 17.72% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 14.80 |
Growth
| Metric | 1979 | BEAN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 18.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 15.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1979 | BEAN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.41% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 10.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1979 | BEAN |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.26 | 6.89 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.39 | 5.65 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.00 | 0.20 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4567 | 0.6634 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #11,700 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1979 | BEAN |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 2027.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 5252.30% |
Compare 1979 to peers
Compare BEAN to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.